Tournament: Greenhill RR | Round: 7 | Opponent: Preetham | Judge: Henson, Dorasil
The Value is Morality because ought implies a moral obligation. Practical reason is the only metaethic that doesn’t beg the question because it doesn’t require an extra “why” question. This means that practical reason is the only proper starting point for morality because it avoids any chance of infinite regress. Vellman
As we have seen...to act for reasons.
And, morality, to have any force must require free will on the part of the agent, otherwise it fails to be a guide for action. Therefore, it follows that the only binding moral laws is the law we impose on ourselves, not from any external factors. Korsgaurd.
This is just...for its own sake.
Compulsory voting ought to be a right that shouldn’t be violated Swenson writes,
Katherine M. Swenson, J.D. Candidate, 2007, "Sticks, Carrots, Donkey Votes, and True Choice: A Rationale for Abolishing Compulsory Voting in Australia," Minnesota Journal of International Law, Summer, 16 Minn. J. Int'l L. 525, p. 540-4
As discussed above...followed the law.
Requiring people to vote violates the right to abstain from voting Lever
Anabelle Lever, Philosophy Professor-London School of Economic and Political Science, 2008, "Compulsory voting: a critical perspective," British Journal of Political Science, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23098/1/Compulsory_voting28LSERO29.pdf, p. 26
So, too, people might have compelling reasons to prefer abstention to ticking their names off a list, and then going home. There is something unpleasant and disrespectful about forcing people to turn up simply to tick their names off a list, rather than letting them abstain. Putting that aside, though, the different ways in which such an act might be interpreted are hardly a matter of indifference to voters who take seriously the strategic and moral aspects of voting. So it is far from clear that people have duties to vote as long as they have no conscientious objections, and are not forced to register a political preference.
Coercion outweighs, conditions like poverty are inevitable, it’s futile to try to solve.
Kelley,
founder and senior fellow of the Atlas Society, 98
(David Kelley, founder and senior fellow of the Atlas Society, 1998, “A life of one's own,” p68-69)
To be sure...he otherwise could.
There is no value to life in their framework – coercion makes us into mere tools of the state. Hayek writes,
Hayek, Nobel Prize winner for Economics, 60 (F.A. Hayek, Nobel Prize winner for Economics, 1960, The Constitution of Liberty, p.20)
By “coercion” we...prescribed by the other.
Coercion ensures extinction.
Beres,
Louis Rene Professor of International Law, Purdue University, Spring, 1994, ARIZONA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW, p. 23-4
This, then, is an...of modern humankind.