Tournament: Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: Anyone Who Violates The Interps | Judge: Whoevers Holding the Ballot
I will be posting all of my theory and topicality interps here. If you want to see the whole shell or something just hit me up
stevent.krawczyk@gmail.com
Note: If you have a legitimate reason why you need to see a shell you can email me. If there's no chance I'll hit you and I suspect you just want to steal the shells then I'm (obviously) not going to send them to you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------~--~--
AEC
Debaters using affirmative ethics choice on the January/February 2014 topic must select a utilitarian standard that includes all ends-based offense.
SPEC THEORY
Debaters must specify the scope of their advocacy in the AC by providing a policy option that they defend with a qualified solvency advocate.
Mahnken 10
Thomas G. Mahnken (Visiting Scholar at the Merrill Center for Strategic Studies at The Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy Planning) Winter 2010 “ Bridging the Gap Between the Worlds of Ideas and Action” Orbis Vol. 54 No. 1 Science Direct Pages 4-13
Some calls for
AND
intellectual window
Schaap 05
Andrew Schaap, University of Melbourne, Politics, Vol 25 Iss 1, February 2005
Learning political theory
AND
subject: their teacher.
Boggs 2k
(CAROL BOGGS, PF POLITICAL SCIENCE – SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, 2000, THE END OF POLITICS, 250-1)
But it is
AND
muddling-through theories.
EXTRACTION T
For the January/February 2014 topic, affirmative debaters must only implement a plan that fiats the prioritization of environmental protection over natural resource extraction. The debater must only gain impacts from the implementation of that plan.
CONFLICT T
The affirmative debater must defend a reduction of resource extraction for the January/February 2014 topic.
CONSERVATION T
On the January/February 2014 topic, the affirmative debater must defend environmental protection, which is distinct from resource conservation.
Arruda 13
Arruda, Joe, Dr (Pitt State University). "Careers with an Environmental Spin." Careers with an Environmental Spin. Pitt State
The two traditional
AND
fish, and wildlife.
RESOURCE T
For the January/February 2014 topic, resource extraction is limited to oil, natural gas, and minerals.
Frank 10
Barney Frank (Senator, sponsor of bill). “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.” H. R. 4173. One Hundred Eleventh Congress of the United States of America. 5 January 2010. http://www.workingre.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/APPRAISAL-PROVISIONS-OF-BASE-TEXT.pdf
‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection
AND
resource extraction issuer.
World Trade Report 10
World Trade Report. “Natural resources: definitions, trade patterns and globalization.” 2010. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/wtr10-2b_e.pdf
All goods either
AND
case of fish.
ONE COUNTRY THEORY
On the Janurary/February 2014 topic, the affirmative debater must advocate environmental protection for developing countries as a general principle. They may specify environmental protection policies but must advocate implementation in developing countries in general.
CASE DISCLOSURE THEORY
Debaters must disclose tag lines and citations along with the first and last three words of all cards in their affirmative case at least an hour before the round in which a given case is read. Disclosure should be on the NDCA Wiki or LD Leaks because those are the most common and accessible case lists.
Bietz 10
Bietz, Mike (former President of the National Debate Coaches Association; debate coach at Harvard-Westlake School in Los Angeles.) “The Case for Public Case Disclosure.” May 2010.
The Case for
AND
maintaining this integrity.
THEORY DISCLOSURE THEORY
Debaters must disclose all theory and topicality interpretations and citations with first and last three words for evidence at least an hour before the round in which they are run. Disclosure should be on the NDCA Wiki or LD Leaks because those are the most common and accessible case lists.
E-SPEC
When affirmative debaters run a plan on the January/February 2014 topic that must be enforced, they must specify an enforcement mechanism in their plan text.
Elmore 80
Richard F. Elmore (prof. of political science at UWashington) Political Science Quarterly; 1980; p. 605
The emergence of
AND
realm of implementation
FLASH THEORY
For tournaments using the January/February 2014 topic, debaters have to flash or email anything they plan on reading in the round to their opponent before it is read when prompted to by their opponent.