Tournament: Hendrickson | Round: 1 | Opponent: Not Sure | Judge: Not Sure
V: G.L.
1) Res. in a democracy
2) Govand#39;ts enforce M and J
3) Question of what a govt ought do
VC: Promoting Dem. Principles
1) Upholds democracy
2) Res. context
Lipset (Seymour Martin Lipset, 1994 “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy”)
and#34;Controversy in this area...to gain office.and#34;

c1) Risk of democratice collaps w/o comp. voting
Orszag (Peter R. Orszag, “Make voting mandatory”, Jun 19, 2012)
and#34;For economists, the...fail to voteand#34;

St. Thomas Law Review furthers (Jason Marisam, 2009, and#34;Voter Turnout: From Cost to Cooperation,and#34; St. Thomas Law Review, Winter, 21 St. Thomas L. Rev. 190, p. 192-3)
and#34;First, I will present...groups should increaseand#34;

c2) Voter turnout
a) CV maxes voter turnout
Rosenberg (Matt Rosenberg, and#34;Compulsory Voting,and#34; 2003)
and#34;Compulsory voting in...94 to 96and#34;
b) Turnout key to rule by the people
St. Thomas Law Review (Jason Marisam, 2009, and#34;Voter Turnout: From Cost to Cooperation,and#34; St. Thomas Law Review, Winter, 21 St. Thomas L. Rev. 190)
and#34;The essence of...disadvantaged groupsand#34;
c)Turnout key to political activity
Murthy (T.S. Krishna Murthy, 2012, and#34;The Relevance of Voting Rights in Modern Democracy,and#34
and#34;The quality of...indifference and apathyand#34;
d)Turnout key to majority rule
Murthy 2 (T.S. Krishna Murthy, 2012, and#34;The Relevance of Voting Rights in Modern Democracy,and#34
and#34;Democracy is meant...democracy more meanginfuland#34;

c3: CV increases the quality of voting
Harvard Law Review ( (Harvard Law Review, 2007, and#34;The Case for Compulsory Voting in the United States,and#34; )
and#34;In addition to...communicating those positions.and#34;

c4: CV is not coercive, key 2 protecting freedom from domination
Lardy (Heather Lardy, summer 2004, and#34;Is there a right not to Vote?and#34
and#34;Pursuing freedom as...right to voteand#34;

--------------------------------------------
Next Case

Part 1 Formal Logic
Res is a conditional statemetn and#34;if p, then q.and#34; Implies:
1) O = log. consequence
2) Disproving premises= res is true
3)Neg must prove cv does not stem from democracy
4) Truth testing, not policy
5) S: Being consistent with democratic principles
Lipset (Seymour Martin Lipset, 1994 “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy”)
and#34;Controversy in this area...to gain office.and#34;
Formal logic prerequisite to theory. Gateway issue to arguing, only viable interpretation of the resolution

Part 2 Determinism
Either actions are pre-determined or pure chance, free will has no effect
Smart (JJC Smart, “Free-Will, Praise and Blame” 1961)
and#34;We can now consider...pure chance has failedand#34;
1) Voting is never voluntary
2) Neg canand#39;t meet above burden

Part 3 is autonomy
Autonomy leads to violence, marginilazation and exclusion.
Cohen (Peter Cohen, 200, and#34;Is the addiction doctor the voodoo priest of Western man?” )
and#34;In our modern western...hunter and Inquisitor.and#34;
1) Negative has a violent mindset
2) Affirms pre-standard, autonomy is a social construct
3) Affirms under my standard, negating is exclusionary

Part 4 Democracy
A. Voluntary risks democratic collapse
Orszag (Peter R. Orszag, “Make voting mandatory”, Jun 19, 2012)
and#34;For economists, the...fail to voteand#34;
B. CV maxes voter turnout
Rosenberg (Matt Rosenberg, and#34;Compulsory Voting,and#34; 2003)
and#34;Compulsory voting in...94 to 96and#34;

Part 5 Theory
1) Drop arg not debater bc other args dont violate interp
2) Aff gets to choose the roundand#39;s fwl
a. time skew
b. Neg can adapt to aff fwk, aff canand#39;t
3) Aff = rvis
a. discourages trivial theory
b. time skew
--------------------------------------------
Theory Shells
Interp: Debaters may only run theory shells or topicality if the interpretation and standards for said theory shell is disclosed on the NDCA wiki 30 minutes before round. I reserve the right to clarify.
Standards:

1. Substantive Education
   2. Theory Education
   3. Norms modeling
   4. Better Quality of Theory Debates
   5. Preventing Ex Post Facto Punishment

Tournament: UT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any
Purely hypothetical disputes are irresolvable, some practical application of a theory is necessary
McDermid (David McDermid, Professor of Philosophy, Trent University, “Pragmatism,” http://www.iep.utm.edu/pragmati/#H2)
"This method is...judge by appearances."
Also, pragmatism allows for the resolution of problems that arise.
McDermid 2
"Pragmatism may be...no genuine problem."
And the inevitable imperfection of all our theories makes pragmatism our best bet.
Hookway (Christopher, "Pragmatism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/pragmatism/.)
"Having discussed pragmatist...do with it."
AND prefer pragmatism:

1. side constraint to theories
   2. Real World Education
   3. Value relies on practice
   4. Context of CJS
   ACP impractical
2. Not understood
   Northrop, (Daniel. “The Attorney-Client Privilege and Information Disclosed to an Attorney with the Intention That the Attorney Draft a Document To Be Released to Third Parties: Public Policy Calls for at Least the Strictest Application of the Attorney-Client Privilege.” Fordham Law Review. 2009. Web. 7 Oct 2013)
   "First, both the...than actually exists."
   2. ACP - deceitful system
   Northrop 2
   "Bentham's nineteenth-century... will be served."
   3. ACP has no benefit
   Rice ((Paul Rice, "Attorney-Client Privilege: The Eroding Concept Of Confidentiality Should Be Abolished." Duke Law Journal. 1998)
   "THe Fallacy in...no corresponding benefit."
   4. Strains judicial system.
   Rice 2
   "Antiquities, time-honored...requirement of secrecy."
   Inquisitorial system covers ts, adverseray covers acp
   Blondel (Erin C. Blondel, JD Duke University School Of Law, “VICTIMS’ RIGHTS IN AN ADVERSARY SYSTEM,” 10/11/2008, Duke Law Journal)
   "These procedural differences...strictly enforcing procedures."
   Inq system practical
   1.We have a complex legal system.
   Goldstein (Abraham L. Goldstein, “Reflections on Two Models: Inquisitorial themes in American Criminal Procedure.” Stanford Law Review, Vol. 26. 1974.)
   "It was probably...is commonly realized."
   2. Adv system prevents conclusive trials
   Goodpaster (Gary Goodpaster, Dean and Prof. Law, UC Davis, “ON THE THEORY OF AMERICAN ADVERSARY CRIMINAL TRIAL,” 1987, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology)
   "Other factors that...guilty party's acquittal."
   3. Even if adv system is practical, we can ts in it.
   Goodpaster 2
   "The most common...accomplish this goal."
   Lastly, limiting acp is utilitarian.
   Simko (Joshua K. Simko, Duke University School of Law, “INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE, THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, AND LEGAL ETHICS: AN EXAMINATION AND SUGGESTION FOR ALASKA,” 2002)
   "The strict responsibility...will likely prevail."

Tournament: ANY | Round: 8 | Opponent: ANY | Judge: ANY
I wont read anything from there, and i cant delete it.

Tournament: UT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: All
I read a generic util fwk (Cummisky and Woller)
CONTACT ME BEFORE ROUND IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE CITES TO ANYTHING.
Plan Text:The United States criminal justice system should enforce a system of mandatory reporting for attorneys gaining information about child abuse from their clients. To clarify, in cases of child abuse, the government will directly look into conversations between attorneys and their clients.

Besharov is the solvency advocate (Douglas J. Besharov, writer for the Vilanova Law Review, “The legal aspects of reporting known and suspected child abuse and neglect,” 1978, Vilanova Law Review, http://www.welfareacademy.org/pubs/legal/legalaspects_78.pdf)
"Mandatory reporting laws...and treatment services."
AND
"Because helping services...abuse or neglect."

Advantages:
1) Child development
2) Repeated abuse

UV Theory
aff rvis

1. time skew
   2. aff layering
   3. strat skew
   4. ground skew
   Neg theory is reasonability
2. time skew
   Positively worded
3. Infinite prohibitions
   2. makes theory pointless
   If neg wins T, drop the arg
4. numerous interps
   2. Reciprocity
   3. Abuse is limited.