Tournament: Greenhill | Round: 1 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JZ | Judge: Josh Aguilar
Attempt solve minorities rights = violence
Glowacka ‘6 (Culture Machine, Vol 8 (2006) Community and the Work of Death: Thanato-Ontology in Hannah Arendt and Jean-Luc Nancy, Dorota Glowacka ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF HUMANITIES; ADJUNCT PROFESSOR MA(Wroclaw), PhD(SUNY)
"Reflecting on the... on subjective identification"

Community = exclusion
Morin ‘6 (Culture Machine, Vol 8 (2006) Putting Community Under Erasure: Derrida and Nancy on the Plurality of Singularities Marie-Eve Morin Department of Philosophy. 3-45 Assiniboia Hall. University of Alberta.
"First, communities tend... that are excluded"

Exclusion = war
Norris ‘2K (Jean-Luc Nancy and the Myth of the Common Andrew Norris Constellations Volume 7, No 2, 2000
"Nancy, however, is... community 'to work'"

Role of Ballot = deconstruct oppressive norms
William Spanos writes Professor of English at Binghamton University, The End of Education: Towards Posthumanism, 1993, p. 196.
"In insisting that... knowledge's own sake"

Tournament: Greenhill | Round: 1 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JZ | Judge: Josh Aguilar
Lottery program solves turnout - Mega Millions proves
Norm Ornstein. July 27, 2012. “The US Should Require All Citizens to Vote” The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/07/the-us-should-require-all-citizens-to-vote/259902/
"Of course, mandatory... a local election"

Humans are selfish
James Sage, between 2008 and 2010 Ph.D. Department of Philosophy at University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, “V for Vendetta and Political Philosophy: A Critique of Thomas Hobbes”, http://www.uwsp.edu/philosophy/FacultyStaffDocs/jSage/Sage20V20for20Vendetta.pdf
"For Hobbes in... to seek peace"

CV decrease turnout long term
David Ruescas. June 02, 2012. ”Why Vote? The so called Paradox of Voting” http://davidruescas.com/2012/02/06/why-vote-the-so-called-paradox-of-voting/
"Someone asked me... have done otherwise."

Tournament: Alta | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bellarmine MF | Judge: Charles Wanless
CLS K

The affirmative is attempting to reform the legal system by fiat-ing change, via truth-seeking in the criminal justice system; the affirmative is valuing the legal system. Reforming the legal system doesn’t solve the current flaws, we must completely dismantle and reject the legal system in order to solve racism.

Quigley, Bill., Legal Director, Center for Constitutional Rights; Professor Loyola New Orleans, July 2010, Fourteen Examples of Racism in the Justice System, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-quigley/fourteen-examples-of-raci_b_658947.html, Date Accessed: 8/21/13

Martin Luther King Jr., said we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution
AND
Nothing short of a major social movement can dismantle this new caste system." 

Law is destructive and should be rejected: legal discourse about the current system cements existing systems of oppression because it endlessly repeats the claim that it is the solution. The Affirmative is misguided in its understanding of the legal system

Robert W. Gordon, Professor of Law at Stanford University, ¶ 1987 ¶ “Unfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches To Law,”¶ Florida State University Law Review¶ (15 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 195), Summer, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions
via Lexis-Nexis

Now a central tenet of CLS work has been that ¶ the ordinary ¶ discourses
AND
taking collective action against evil without suffering the greater evil of despotic power. 

And, Legal discourses are discourses of power 

Robert W. Gordon 2, Professor of Law at Stanford University, ¶ 1987 ¶ “Unfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches To Law,”¶ Florida State University Law Review¶ (15 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 195), Summer, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions
via Lexis-Nexis

These discourses of legal and technical rationality, of¶ rights, consent, necessity
AND
express the interests and the perspectives of the powerful people who use them.

The Affirmative’s legal discourse and faith in the current legal system actively contributes to authoritarianism. The current view of Law is unquestionably violent; and ensures the dominance of those in power, cutting off alternative views of justice. 

Lynne Henderson, Professor of Law at the Indiana University School of Law at Bloomington, 1991 “Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law,” Indiana Law Journal (66 Ind. L.J. 379), Spring, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via Lexis-Nexis
               
The lack of scholarly acknowledgment, until very recently, of Cover's suggestion that law
AND
even unconstitutional lower court injunctions, was, for Cover, pure authoritarianism\
The Criminal Justice System is an attempt to marginalize through authoritarian dominance

Quigley 2, Bill., Legal Director, Center for Constitutional Rights; Professor Loyola New Orleans, July 2010, Fourteen Examples of Racism in the Justice System, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-quigley/fourteen-examples-of-raci_b_658947.html, Date Accessed: 8/21/13

Other critics like Professor Dylan Rodriguez see the criminal justice system as a key part
AND
terror - domination and control by capture, immobilization, punishment and liquidation.

The Alternative is voting negative as a form of active and consistent legal criticism. Criticism is a prerequisite towards breaking down the system, only then can we accept responsibility for our actions. 

Joseph William Singer, Associate Professor of Law at Boston University, 1984 “The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal ¶ Theory,” Yale Law Journal (94 Yale L.J. 1), November, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via Lexis-Nexis

What shall we do then about legal theory? I think ¶ we should abandon
AND
live together. We are going to have to answer that question ourselves.¶ 

The role of the ballot is to endorse the debater that best deconstructs oppressive ideologies – this debate round is uniquely important in creating change.

William Spanos writes Professor of English at Binghamton University, The End of Education: Towards Posthumanism, 1993, p. 196.

In insisting that the theoretical practice of the

Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: Octas | Opponent: Immaculate Heart KH | Judge: Hamilton, Placido, Bentley
Inquisitorial CP

COUNTER PLAN TEXT: The United States Criminal Justice System Ought to Implement an Inquisitorial System of Justice in place of its present Adversarial System.

The Current Adversarial System is Inefficient

KEITH A. Findley Clinical Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School; Co-Director, Wisconsin
Innocence Project; President, Innocence Network. J.D., Yale Law School, 1985; B.A., Indiana University, http://www.nylslawreview.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Findley-article.pdf 

1981.The current American system is marked by an adversary process so compromised by
AND
of false convictions, as well as failures to convict the guilty.2

The Inquisitorial System is more effective at truth seeking that the criminal justice system and guarantees more rights than the aff world

Narelle Bedford and Robin Creyke. 2006. “Inquisitorial Processes in Australian Tribunals” The Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated. 

The following description by Certoma, an Australian academic trained in the civil law,
AND
elements of the civil law system as it is generally perceived in Australia.

The Inquisitorial Criminal Justice System is more focused on Truth-Seeking than the Adversarial System

KEITH A.  Findley. Clinical Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School; Co-Director, Wisconsin
Innocence Project; President, Innocence Network. J.D., Yale Law School, 1985; B.A., Indiana University, http://www.nylslawreview.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Findley-article.pdf 

An inquisitorial system is said to be more focused on truth-finding than the
AND
hypothesis that the adversary process itself is a contributor to erroneous convictions.”101

Tournament: Alta | Round: 6 | Opponent: Lynbrook IP | Judge: Sean Nadel
Post Fiat FW Stuff

The goodness of pleasure and badness of pain are qualities all humans experience that relate back to our objective considerations.

Thomas Nagel NYU Philo Prof “The View from Nowhere” Oxford Press, 1986, pp 156-168, MG

I shall defend the unsurprising claim that sensory pleasure is good and pain bad,
AND
such cases. There can be no reason to reject the appearances here.

If each person values their own happiness they have to value everybody’s.

Sayre- McCord. Geoffrey, Graduate degree at University of Pittsburg “Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense,” UNC Press, 2001, pp 21-22, MG)

According to the second argument, the evaluative starting point is again each person thinking
AND
own happiness, or rational nature, as valuable, as an end.

Lacan K

But, Discourse Comes First – shapes reality

Bleiker, 0 Ph.D. visiting research and teaching affiliations at Harvard, Cambridge, Humboldt, Tampere, Yonsei and Pusan National University as well as the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague,(Roland, Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics, Cambridge University Press)

To recognize that language is politics is to acknowledge that form and substance cannot be
AND
. Dissent in global politics is the process that interferes with such objectifications. 

The affirmative is attempting to reform the criminal justice system with truth seeking. All reforms are utopian impulses in America

Ruy Teixeira, March 27, 2013. In defense of Utopia, Ph.D. in sociology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/03/27/1672911/in-defense-of-utopia-part-i/, 

There was also a utopian impulse in America, though it had its roots in
AND
on maintaining American social programs or, at best, their modest expansion.

Universal ethical principles i.e. morality, truth, justice etc. are utopian

Stavrakavis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the Political, Visiting Professor, Department of Government, University of Essex, pages 127-129

In the first place Lacan’s suggestion that the status of the Freudian conception of the
AND
that is asked of him, but he also knows there isn’t any. 

The creation of a utopian ideal causes ascetic resentment against the real world and debate

Turanli, Aydan.The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 26 (2003) 55-63, Nietzsche and the Later Wittgenstein: An Offense to the Quest for Another World. Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Istanbul Technical University). 

The craving for absolutely general specifications results in doing metaphysics. Unlike Wittgenstein, Nietzsche
AND
"to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle"

Vote Neg and Reject the Aff: The Alternative is to accept social antagonism, and rear our focus on current issues, rather than trying to achieve something unattainable, only then, we solve for any problem in the real world. When faced with disharmony, we have a choice a) we can continue down the failed path of utopianism or b) we can accept that social antagonism is inevitable and try to design democratic institutions capable of accommodating competing political visions. 

Stavrakavis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the Political, Visiting Professor, Department of Government, University of Essex, pages 136-138). 

To recapitulate, the starting point of this chapter was the disappointment and resentment caused
AND
society is lacking, it is crossed, barre? by the impossible real.

The role of the ballot is to endorse the debater that best deconstructs harmful ideologies your role as an educator mandates that you reject representation frames that justify violence and oppression.
Gill:
Too many intellectuals subscribe to or create orthodoxy that simply reinforces dominant power-knowledge
AND
rethink the potentials in society that allow for creativity and greater human possibility.

Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: Octas | Opponent: Immaculate Heart KH | Judge: Hamilton, Placido, Bentley
Security K

The affirmative’s security paradigm necessitates preemption, a policy based purely on potential threats. The only result can be self-fulfilling prophecy – because threats are always potential, preemption necessitates provoking the threat in order to justify itself. Turns the case.

Massumi 07 (Brian, Communication Department of the Université de Montréal , “Potential Politics and the Primacy of Preemption”) 

Fear is always a good reason to go politically conditional. Fear is the palpable
AND
or virtual cause really, directly into a taking-actual-effect. 

Security is a paradox. It tries to secure peace while creating endless war, which eventually leads to extinction because of the aggregation from constructing threats.

Dillon 96 (Michael, Routledge Publishers, Prof@Lancaster, Questia, Politics of security: towards a political philosophy of continental thought  p. 15) JFS

What truths about the human condition, he therefore prompted me to ask, are
AND
technology, and the advent of the real prospect of human species extinction.

Vote Neg - Rejection of representations opens space for new languages and discourses which can challenge negative norms.

Veronica Vasterling, Associate Professor in Philosophy at U of Nijimegen, Butler's Sophisticated Constructivism: A Critical Assessment, Hypatia 14.3, 1999, pg. 17-38
I
t is important to distinguish between intelligibility and accessibility for two reasons. First,
AND
insofar as it challenges oppressive norms that regulate the intelligibility of the body. 

First, the discourse of the round has real impact.

Shawn Cassiman, Sociology Professor 2008. Resisting the Neo-liberal Poverty Discourse: On Constructing Deadbeat Dads and Welfare Queens. Department of Sociology, University of Dayton.

The facts belie the substance of this rhyme. Words do hurt. Words are
AND
shape/create our world—views, our values, and ourselves.

Role of Ballot is to endorse debater that deconstructs oppression

Spanos, William. Professor of English at Binghamton University. The End of Education: Towards Posthumanism, 1993, p. 196.

In insisting that the theoretical practice of the oppositional intellectuals ought to be a local
AND
the benefit of all “mankind,” if not for knowledge’s own sake

Tournament: Alta | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bellarmine MF | Judge: Charles Wanless
Topicality - "In"

“In” is defined as a function word to indicate inclusion within limits
-Merriam Webster

Tournament: Alta | Round: Octas | Opponent: Miramonte AB | Judge: TAmestoy, Munoz, Dailey
Action is unified as we can distinguish between different steps in an action and the whole action.  
Rodl  explains:
Suppose I walked from a to c, via b. It may be that
AND
, an action is not an aggregate, but a unity of phases.
Action theory comes first because it determines the basis of moral discussion—morality is premised on judging certain actions, but we first need an account of what an action is in order to judge it. 

Moral arguments must flow from absolute reason. Any non-reason based framework is circular.
C.S. Lewis explains:
But the very attempt is absurd.  This is best seen if we consider the
AND
no way, except by begging the question, of getting inside again.

Tournament: Alta | Round: Octas | Opponent: Miramonte AB | Judge: TAmestoy, Munoz, Dailey
Their role of the ballot argument overextends the political by claiming that this debate space represents something more than a competition for a win. Arguing that the ballot carries discursive significance is the same logic as the discourse theory of citizenship which claims every action is political.
Rufo and Atchison, 2011
(Ken Rufo, Ph.D. in Rhetoric from the University of Georgia, Jarrod Atchison, Ph.D. in Rhetoric from the University of Georgia, Review of Communication,  Vol. 11, No. 3, July 2011, pp. 193215)
Laclau (1996) has written about the inherent emptiness at the heart of the
AND
.g., choosing a consumer good or debating with neighbors over dinner). 

History demonstrates to us that this over-extension carries with it the seeds of tyranny instead of resistance.
Rufo and Atchison, 2011
(Ken Rufo, Ph.D. in Rhetoric from the University of Georgia, Jarrod Atchison, Ph.D. in Rhetoric from the University of Georgia, Review of Communication,  Vol. 11, No. 3, July 2011, pp. 193215)
A Fascism of/and the Political If our feeling of foreboding seems absurd,
AND
necessarily a determination of the extent and comportment of the political per se. 

The alternative is to vote negative to resist the over-extension of the political. Their consistent call for you to use your ballot to support change is the over-extension of the political that always focuses on increasing political participation. Before you consider using your ballot in the name of change you must confront the fascist nature of holding our entire community hostage to their inspection.
Rufo and Atchison, 2011
(Ken Rufo, Ph.D. in Rhetoric from the University of Georgia, Jarrod Atchison, Ph.D. in Rhetoric from the University of Georgia, Review of Communication,  Vol. 11, No. 3, July 2011, pp. 193215)
The mention of fascism is of particular importance here in this debate. As a
AND
entirely is indeed the very essence of fascism. (p. 144)

Tournament: Victory Briefs | Round: 4 | Opponent: Apple Valley MO | Judge: Chris Bentley

The discourse of the affirmative has real world implications as words spoken are simply tools to reach alterior goals.

Bleiker, 0 Ph.D. visiting research and teaching affiliations at Harvard, Cambridge, Humboldt, Tampere, Yonsei and Pusan National University as well as the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague,(Roland, Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics, Cambridge University Press)

To recognize that language is politics is to acknowledge that form and substance cannot be
AND
. Dissent in global politics is the process that interferes with such objectifications. 

The Aff attempts to speak for the developing from their privileged position. Their unique position as belonging to our self-named "developed" country creates an elitist epistemology about what it means to analyze other countries actions. This only reinforces oppressive hierarchies and ignores the group in question.

Alcoff 92. Linda Martín Alcoff (Department of Philosophy at Syracuse University. "The Problem of Speaking For Others" Cultural Critique Winter 1991-92, pp. 5-32.) CC 

The recognition that there is a problem in speaking for others has followed from the
AND
member. But this does not tell us how groups themselves should be delimited

This is especially true in the case of speaking for animals

Eric Katz and Lauren Oechsli, 1993 (Members of the Science, Technology, and Society Program _{New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark. Katz is currently Vice President of the International Society for Environmental Ethics , "Moving beyond Anthropocentrism: Environmental Ethics, Development, and the Amazon", http://www.umweltethik.at/download.php?id=392-http://www.umweltethik.at/download.php?id=392.)}

It is not surprising that anthropocentric arguments dominate discussions of policy: arguments for environmental
AND
as certain, or to use either alternative as a basis for policy.

Calls for "sustainable development" are steeped in anthropocentrism
Hector 8 (Donald Charles Alexander Hector, PhD candidate, July 30, 2008, University of Sydney, "Towards a new philosophy of engineering: structuring the complex problems from the sustainability discourse," http://hdl.handle.net/2123/2690)

Extensive investigation of the nature of sustainability exposed two distinct philosophical positions, referred to
AND
the complexity of the type of problem which emerges from the sustainability discourse.

Speaking for others creates a denial of the other’s ability to govern themselves. This results in a justification for the elimination of "lesser" others within our own population and the individuals being oppressed as a way to resecure normalcy.

Hoffmann 7 Kasper, International Development Studies at Roskilde University, May, "Militarised Bodies and Spirits of Resistance," http://diggy.ruc.dk:8080/bitstream/1800/2766/4/z2.pdf, p 27-29 AD: 6/1/09) CC

In modern forms of government, concepts of the norm and normal have played a
AND
classified as "good", fit and superior (Stoler 1995: 84).

Speaking for others oppresses them—we must stop the impulse to speak to allow the individuals themselves to rise up and speak. The first step is to reject their speech in this round right now.

Marino 5 (Lauren, published author in the Malacester Journal of Philosophy, Volume 14, Issue 1, Spring 2005. "Speaking for Others") CC

What then is the solution? I agree with bell hooks that the oppressed must
AND
faith in the margins to produce new language games to communicate with us.  

====Vote negative to listen – only way to solve, any arguments against the advocacy must be rejected on face====
Deleuze and Foucault ’72 Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault, "Intellectuals and Power," Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault, ed. Donald F. Bouchard, recorded March 4, 1972, http://libcom.org/library/intellectuals-power-a-conversation-between-michel-foucault-and-gilles-deleuze-http://libcom.org/library/intellectuals-power-a-conversation-between-michel-foucault-and-gilles-deleuze BSH

FOUCAULT: It seems to me that the political involvement of the intellectual was traditionally
AND
are so often reform oriented or absolutely reactionary on the level of desire.

The role of the ballot is to endorse the debater that best deconstructs oppressive norms or ideologies.

William Spanos writes ~Professor of English at Binghamton University~, The End of Education: Towards Posthumanism, 1993, p. 196. TP

In insisting that the theoretical practice of the oppositional intellectuals ought to be a local
AND
the benefit of all "mankind," if not for knowledge’s own sake.
And, the role of the judge is to be an educator – Your unique situation as a decision maker gives you the ability to change debate’s practices and endorse positive ideologies.

Rhetorical analysis is a necessary precursor to policy making- representations always come first Dauber 01( Cori Elizabeth, Associate professor of communications at the university of North Caroline Chapel
Hill, "the shot seen round the world: the impact of the images of Mogadishu on american military operations";
http://muse.uq.edu.au.ts.isil.westga.edu/journals/rhetoric_and_public_affairs/v004/4.4dauber.html)  

The impact the Mogadishu images have had on American foreign policy is clear. But
AND
having an important voice at the table—and they should do so. 

No matter the specifics, rejecting the hierarchical rituals of speaking is always liberatory. We must open up spaces to allow the other to speak—academic spaces are critical locations for this effort.

Alcoff ’92(Linda Martín Professor of Philosophy at Hunter College and the CUNY Graduate Center. Cultural Critique No. 20 Winter, 1991-1992, pp. 5-32 ’The Problem of Speaking for Others’ http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/i258520-http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/i258520 BSH)

Even if the oppressed person’s speech is not liberatory in its content, it remains
AND
and development teams have not found it advantageous under capitalism to do so.

Tournament: Victory Briefs | Round: 2 | Opponent: BASIS Scottsdale CD | Judge: Hiyawan Solomon
I also read some bleiker and spanos evidence - i believe its in the speaking for others k

Justice should be distinct from politics – clouding political decisions with considerations of justice provides the basis for an unending ’war against war’

Norris ’98 Andrew Norris, assistant professor of political science at the university of Pennsylvania, "Carl Schmitt on Friends, Enemies and the Political," Telos 112 (Summer 1998): 68-88, http://www.freespeechproject.com/telos40.html
Compare this interpretation with Leo Strauss’s reading of Schmitt: Strauss concludes that, in
AND
servants remain as alienated and isolated in conflict as they were in peace. 

Viewing Difference as ’evil’ and ’inhuman’ is wrong, even if the enemy is evil because of their warmongering, hatred and rejection of war creates a self-fulfilling prophecy that will lead to extinction because we reject and fear war so much we will fight to destroy those who wish to wage war

Odysseos 8 Dr. Louiza Odysseos is a Senior Lecturer Department of International Relations, March 17, 2008, "Liberalism’s War, Liberalism’s Order: Rethinking the Global Liberal Order as a ’Global Civil War", paper prepared of Liberal Internationalism, San Francisco AKS
Jean-Luc Nancy does not utilise the exact terminology of ’global civil war’
AND
to destroy than the world itself…’ (Nancy 2007: 34).

The Alternative is to vote Negative to Draw a Line in the Sand

The Alternative solves, Violence is inevitable because of the drive for the individual, it is only a question of the magnitude of this violence.  The Alternative draws distinctions between friends and enemies, and stops acts to cloud agonism such as ’justice’
Rasch ’5 William Rasch, Associate Professor of Germanic Studies at Indiana University, "Lines in the Sand: Enmity as a Structuring Principle," South Atlantic Quarterly 104:2, Spring 2005, AKS
But as Max Weber observed firsthand, ascetic quietude leads so often, so¶
AND
it may also always produce recurring, asphyxiating political nightmares of absolute exclusion.

Tournament: Golden Desert | Round: 6 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake WG | Judge: Liz Letak

The discourse of the affirmative has real world implications as words spoken are simply tools to reach alterior goals.

Bleiker, 0 Ph.D. visiting research and teaching affiliations at Harvard, Cambridge, Humboldt, Tampere, Yonsei and Pusan National University as well as the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague,(Roland, Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics, Cambridge University Press)

To recognize that language is politics is to acknowledge that form and substance cannot be
AND
. Dissent in global politics is the process that interferes with such objectifications. 

Human Rights create a world where all are to conform to a universal ideal of ethics where those who disagree are expelled or eliminated

Rasch 3 (William, Associate Professor of Germanic Studies at Indiana University, Human Rights as Geopolitics, pages 138-141 aks)
In the past, we/they, neighbor/foreigner, friend/enemy
AND
of humanity becomes for Rawls the simple but uncontested sovereignty of liberalism itself. 

Justice should be distinct from politics – clouding political decisions with considerations of justice provides the basis for an unending ’war against war’ – they destroy difference by believing in an objective ethic: CX checks on this

Norris ’98 Andrew Norris, assistant professor of political science at the university of Pennsylvania, "Carl Schmitt on Friends, Enemies and the Political," Telos 112 (Summer 1998): 68-88, http://www.freespeechproject.com/telos40.html
Compare this interpretation with Leo Strauss’s reading of Schmitt: Strauss concludes that, in
AND
servants remain as alienated and isolated in conflict as they were in peace. 

Viewing Difference as ’evil’ and ’inhuman’ is wrong, even if the enemy is evil because of their warmongering, hatred and rejection of war creates a self-fulfilling prophecy that will lead to extinction because we reject and fear war so much we will fight to destroy those who wish to wage war

Odysseos 8 Dr. Louiza Odysseos is a Senior Lecturer Department of International Relations, March 17, 2008, "Liberalism’s War, Liberalism’s Order: Rethinking the Global Liberal Order as a ’Global Civil War", paper prepared of Liberal Internationalism, San Francisco AKS
Jean-Luc Nancy does not utilise the exact terminology of ’global civil war’
AND
to destroy than the world itself…’ (Nancy 2007: 34).

The Alternative is to vote Negative to Draw a Line in the Sand

The Alternative solves, Violence is inevitable because of the drive for the individual, it is only a question of the magnitude of this violence.  The Alternative draws distinctions between friends and enemies, and stops acts to cloud agonism such as ’justice’
Rasch ’5 William Rasch, Associate Professor of Germanic Studies at Indiana University, "Lines in the Sand: Enmity as a Structuring Principle," South Atlantic Quarterly 104:2, Spring 2005, AKS
But as Max Weber observed firsthand, ascetic quietude leads so often, so¶
AND
it may also always produce recurring, asphyxiating political nightmares of absolute exclusion.

The role of the ballot is to endorse the debater that best deconstructs oppressive norms or ideologies.

William Spanos writes ~Professor of English at Binghamton University~, The End of Education: Towards Posthumanism, 1993, p. 196. TP

In insisting that the theoretical practice of the oppositional intellectuals ought to be a local
AND
the benefit of all "mankind," if not for knowledge’s own sake.

Tournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: Marcus LH | Judge: Richard Colling
Discourse has real impact
Bleiker, 0 Ph.D. visiting research and teaching affiliations at Harvard, Cambridge, Humboldt, Tampere, Yonsei and Pusan National University as well as the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague,(Roland, Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics, Cambridge University Press)
"To recognize that...with such objectifications"

Affirmative is speaking from privileged position - reinforces oppression
Alcoff 92. Linda Martín Alcoff (Department of Philosophy at Syracuse University. “The Problem of Speaking For Others” Cultural Critique Winter 1991-92, pp. 5-32.) CC
"The recognition that... should be delimited"

Speaking for others justifies elimination of "lower"
Hoffmann 7 Kasper, International Development Studies at Roskilde University, May, “Militarised Bodies and Spirits of Resistance,” http://diggy.ruc.dk:8080/bitstream/1800/2766/4/z2.pdf, p 27-29 AD: 6/1/09) CC
"In modern forms...fit and superior"

Reject urge to speak for others
Marino 5 (Lauren, published author in the Malacester Journal of Philosophy, Volume 14, Issue 1, Spring 2005. “Speaking for Others”) CC
"What then is...communicate with us"