Tournament: Stanford | Round: 3 | Opponent: Leah Shapiro | Judge: Barbara Bryan
I value Justice b/c it refers to the proper distribution of benefits and burdens.
First, in any society justice provides justification between citizens. We can’t rely on specific metaphysical viewpoints because they couldn’t serve as the basis for reasonable agreements in a pluralistic society. Freeman
Samuel Freeman Avalon Professor in the Humanities at The University of Pennsylvania. Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press. New York, NY. 2007. 37
We have considered how the social contract plays a role within Rawls's conception of justice
AND
that Rawls sees as is appropriate for a democratic society.
Analytic Framework Comparison
Second, Individuals are considered moral equals unless a morally relevant distinction exists to differentiate them. This requires unbiased decision-making to prevent arbitrary harms, but in order to make those decisions, moral agents must place themselves behind a veil of ignorance. Freeman 2
Freeman, Samuel, "Original Position", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/original-position/.
The remedy for such biased judgments is to redefine the initial situation. Rather than
AND
any person or society is morally irrelevant and potentially prejudicial to their decision.
Epistemic Analytical Justification
Additionally, under the veil of ignorance agents would adopt policies that benefit the least well off. Garrett Garrett, Jan. "John Rawls on Justice." Rawls on Justice. Western Kentucky University, n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2012. http://www.wku.edu/~jan.garrett/ethics/johnrawl.htm.
A self-interested rational person behind the Veil of Ignorance would not want
AND
to the privileged positions is not blocked by discrimination according to irrelevant criteria.
This precludes all other frameworks for 2 reasons
Analytics
The standard is benefitting the least advantaged. Prefer the standard for 3 additional reasons
3 Analytics
I contend that resource extraction is necessary to benefit the least advantaged.
First, Resource extraction bridges the socioeconomic gap. Balarezo and Wiig 12
Jorge Balarezo and Henrik Wiig. The mighty few vs. the silent majority – Barriers to resource extraction for poverty reduction in Peru. Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research. 2012.
In consequence, the poverty and extreme poverty in the urban coast and highlands were
AND
for social programs rose by just over 80 in relation to 2007.
Prefer my evidence
2 warrants
And resource extraction also decreases inequality by alleviating poverty. Lopez-Feldman et al 07
López-Feldman, Alejandro, Jorge Mora, and J. Edward Taylor. "Does natural resource extraction mitigate poverty and inequality? Evidence from rural Mexico and a Lacandona Rainforest Community." Environment and Development Economics 12.02 (2007): 251-269.
Our findings highlight the importance of income from natural resource extraction in alleviating poverty and
AND
Gini coefficient by 0.36 and 0.11, respectively.
Prefer this study
3 warrants
Second, Resource extraction gives the government the ability to take effective action to protect the environment making it a perquisite for developing countries. Beckerman 92
Beckerman, W. 1992. Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? Whose environment? World Development 20, 481 – 496.
In general, therefore, as with access to safedrinking water or sanitation, although
AND
to improve your environment is to progress economicallybecome rich.47